Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Oh, the Religion. Oh, the Rant.

I've been thinking a lot about sin.

(And yes, this is going to be a religion-heavy post. If that makes you uncomfortable, you can leave, you have that right. But remember, grasshopper, that which challenges us makes us stronger. Maybe you'll learn something. Maybe you'll disagree. As a matter of fact, I like arguments! Leave me a cranky comment and I'll have a ball.)

So yes, sin. That word doesn't get used much today. You'll never see it reported in the media, and very rarely does the typical pastor use it from the pulpit. It's an uncomfortable word, a hush-hush sort of word. People today, even Christians, don't want to admit to failings. They don't want to admit weakness, an inherent need for rescue.

And don't even think about suggesting that there is one truth and only one truth. You'll get crucified. (Pun intended.)

Our church, the Orthodox Church, talks about sin a lot. As in, "Of sinners, I am chief." Every time we get together for the liturgy, we chant portions that outline our sin, our unworthiness, our inestimable need for God's forgiveness and holiness. We don't go so far as to lament our chains to sin; we believe we can be forever freed from sin, which is holiness. But we definitely use the liturgy to relate our human, depraved condition. Stephen and I try to take these words seriously, although you might like to know that the majority of the time we're fielding crayon-on-pew accidents, cranky, hiccup-prone babies, and Baylor-going-limp-and-screaming-for-no-reason episodes.

We try, we really do.

Anyway, for anyone who cares, I'm sick of it. Not of our church--I think they have it right. I'll go so far as to say I know they have it right. What I'm sick of is the post-modern world view that says something mamby-pamby like, "Oh, we all have our own paths to truth. God is here to comfort us. He wants to offer healing. And however you find Him is okay."

[Insert frustrated snort.]

I really doubt Jesus came to Earth in human form, commanded us to repent multiple times, and allowed Himself to be put to death through the most agonizing, horrible means possible all to offer us happy, peace-filled clouds of comfort. He came to give us a way out of our depravity, but we have to be willing to look that depravity (at least what of it we are able to see and handle, because, after all, we aren't fully like God yet), see it for what it is, fall on our faces, and repent of it. Over and over, repent. That is why He came.

Maybe I'm rambling. In case this is happening, let me offer you some words by Frederica Matthewes-Green, one of my favorite Christian authors. These snippets are taken from her book The Illumined Heart:

"Talk about repentance makes modern-day Christians nervous. We are embarrassed by the stereotype of old-fashioned preachers hammering on sin and making people feel guilty. We rush to assert that Jesus isn't really like that, he came out of love, he wants to help us. He knows us deep inside and feels our every pain, and his healing love sets us free.

"This is one of those truths that runs out of gas halfway home. The question is, what do we need to be healed of? Subjectively, we think we need sympathy and comfort, because our felt experience is of loneliness and unease. Objectively, our hearts are eaten through with rottenness. A hug and a smile aren't enough...

"[Repentance] is not condemnation, but right diagnosis. It is not judgmentalism, because the judgment is evenly applied: All are sinners, all have fallen short. It is not false guilt, because a lot of the guilt we feel is in fact deserved; we are guilty. Forgiveness of past sins doesn't cure the sickness in the heart that continues to yearn after more. We will remain sick until that healing begins, and it will be a lifelong process.

"What a relief it is to admit this. Like the woman weeping at Jesus' feet, we have nothing more to conceal, no more self-justification, no more self-pity. We are fully known, even in the depths that we ourselves cannot see, cannot bear to see. Instead of hoping that God will love us for our good parts and pass over the rest, we know that he died for the bad parts, and will not rest until they are made right. The depth of our sin proves the height of his love, a height we cannot comprehend until we realize how desperately we need it. We are fully loved, and one day will be fully healed, brought into God's presence without spot or wrinkle or anything."

She speaks the truth. This is the truth. This is our humanly pursuit after heavenly holiness. There is no way around it.

I guess why I am so ticked off lately is that I'm sick of emotional Christianity. I'm sick of being fed the lie that it's all about how I feel day-to-day, how I perceive Christ's comfort, I, I, I, me, me, me. I know many people, many women in particular (and don't get politically correct on me, because people, it's true--it's just how the sexes are built) find a lot of meaning in the emotional aspect of Christianity. And the truth is, it's not always, if often, going to feel warm and fuzzy. And it's not always, if often, about how you feel. It's all about Christ. I have not chosen Christ; He has chosen me.

And if the only way I define my Christianity is through emotions, meaningless, transient, fickle emotions, then my faith is as shaky and unstable as the house built upon the sand (see Matthew 7:26).

I think I'm done for now. I think that rant was enough for awhile. Leave a comment expressing your feelings (ha! feelings!) on the matter, in agreement or otherwise. Remember, I am one of those people who thrives on conflict. If everyone just happily agrees, I will not be happy.

And we like this corner of the internet to remain happy, don't we?

8 comments:

4cunninghams said...

Excellent post. I'm going to ponder it a little longer. I do think you're right. Sorry for no conflict!

Gamma said...

Preach it, sister! Last Sunday in Sunday School we were discussing our church's doctrine of holiness and one dear soul said her friends of a different persuasian were offended by the terms "holiness" and "sanctified" and she was wondering what more contemporary words could we use. I had to jump in with the fact that those two words are scriptural. Why must we use "contemporary" words when scriptural words are timeless. I was tempted to ask her if the word "sin" offended her friends, too. Should we use something more contemporary in its place, like "mistakes"? Christ died for our mistakes? Sheesh. I better stop before someone throws something at my head to knock me off my spiritual soapbox.

Steve said...

My beef is that you used the word "inherit" when I believe you meant "inherent" (last sentence, second paragraph).

What you're saying resonates with both my Nazarene heritage (the possibility and necessity of holiness) and the reason I moved from that heritage to the Orthodox tradition. I felt like holiness was always being discussed, praised, promoted, without actually being pursued corporately. What I mean is, I felt like I got an earful of the necessity of a "personal" holiness but that when it came down to it the church really had no idea of how to achieve this except with more talk about "personal relationship" and "ministry programs". (Note: I am NOT saying that Christianity is NOT about a personal relationship with Christ. I'm saying that it's not-- it CANNOT be-- ONLY about a personal relationship.)

Where was I going with this? Nowhere, I guess. It's just a comment.

Laurie said...

Sorry, Christine, can't give you your thrived on conflict, because I do happily agree. And I say, AMEN!!!

But I must say I do enjoy the "feeling" of peace and joy that I know only comes from knowing Christ and having the full assurance that He is in complete control of the uncertain circumstances that surrround my life. I often have this feeling and it is almost euphoric. Of course it is based on fact, not feeling, but the feeling comes from knowing the fact. Hmm ... not sure where I am going with this, but there it is anyway. (Wish I could write like you!)

And I agree that our Christianity is certainly not defined by our emotions, but it can be reflected in them and I think we need to be reminded that we are often the "only Jesus some people see" and our faith will be observed in how we handle situations that come our way. We are in control of the outward display of our emotions, no matter how "meaningless, transient, or fickle" they may be. I believe that if people know we are Christians, they are watching to see how we are different from those who do not know Christ, especially in how we react to situations. I have to remind myself of this every day in my workplace as I encounter difficult people. And I often forget! Which is why I am so thankful that "Christ died for my bad parts, too" ...

And now I'll step down from MY spiritual soapbox and get back to work.

Laurie said...

I just read Stephen's comments and have to comment. What I learned in growing up in the Nazarene Church was that "holiness" was taking that personal relationship with Christ out in to the world with you, whether it be in your home, school, workplace, or whatever. Holiness is about an attitude of mind and heart, striving to reflect Christ in your life. It's very much about how you treat people, showing them patience, kindness, and compassion, as you know Christ would do the same. Not sure what "corporate holiness" would be or really have to do with it, because when it comes down to it, it is very personal and MAINLY about a personal relationship with Christ and what we DO with that relationship. In my opinion, of course.

Steve said...

My rebuttal to that would be that I don’t think your definition of holiness is complete. All the things you’re talking about (virtues like patience, kindness, and compassion) might be the results of holiness. I don’t think holiness is an attitude or a state of mind, and I maintain that it is not solely or ever mainly about a relationship if you qualify that relationship as “personal”. If that’s “it”, then it extends to all good people everywhere and it doesn’t seem much for Christ to have come and died.

This obviously begs the question as to what holiness is, and I don’t have a good answer to that. I’m more comfortable defining it in terms of negation: what it is not. I know it connotes being “set apart” (in the Biblical context of the temple, priest, etc.) or “dedicated to God’s use”. Throughout the Old Testament things had to be consecrated and made holy to be in God’s presence. The priest was ritually purified so he could endure the holiness of the presence of God.

Then with the coming of Christ somehow the tables are turned and God is “going forth” into creation and making it holy. He sanctifies the body by taking on flesh; he sanctifies death by his own death (which is why Easter is such a celebration). He “reclaims” everything as holy and good and dedicated to the glory of God—as it was originally intended (Christ as the “new Adam”).

The life of a Christian—the life of holiness—is participation in this. We offer creation back up to God. We “reclaim” the created order in its essential context: relation with God. We do this in the context of the Church, the Body of Christ that he established. It is obviously personal, but it cannot be solely personal. Holiness (whatever it is) must exist in the context of the life of the Church.

I suppose this all sounds rather vague, and by now it’s certainly simply clearer to everyone and to myself that I don’t really know what holiness is. But I do know that something is wrong when I (as I did today) pass a flyer advertising a “relaxing evening of worship”. If worship is a way in which we engage holiness, then it certainly won’t be relaxing. It won’t be easy. It won’t be “soothing” or “uplifting”. But it will be real.

Laurie said...

And that's your opinion, of course, Stephen. I, on the other hand, prefer to define things by what they are (or what I believe them to be) than by what they are not. For me, living a HOLY life comes through the renewing of the mind through the Holy Spririt when one accepts Jesus into his/her life (heart, whatever) And I think renewing of the mind is ALL about attitude (in line with the scripture that we are to have the same attitude of Christ ... can't remember the exact reference) Maybe that's all too simplistic. But I think that Christ died to take away our sins and to make us a new creation so that we can go out in to the world and reflect His love.

And I'm sure there is much more to holiness than my trite definition, as you have conveyed through your deep and intellectual writing. :)

How I wish I could express myself as well as you and Christine! But I think I've done an okay job.

See you soon.

William said...

Jesus died for our sins to cleanse us and make us holy. That holiness is what enables us to live a life for Him, to obey Him, which means being able (read: choosing) to spread that holiness to others. I believe that by choosing to live for Him and obey that you are holy.

I agree with Steve that it isn't confined exclusively to a personal relationship with Jesus, that is truly only one side of the same coin.

I need to tune in to this blog more often, good material Christine!